Builds a peer set of similar listed or recently transacted companies and applies their blended multiples, adjusted for size and quality.
Select peers matched on sector, business model, growth profile and scale.
Pull each peer's EV/Revenue and EV/EBITDA multiple.
Compute a blended average, weighting the peers you consider most comparable more heavily.
Apply an illiquidity and size discount — private Indian mid-market companies typically trade 25%–40% below listed peers.
Apply the discounted multiples to your own revenue and EBITDA and blend the two answers.
| Your revenue | ₹60,00,00,000 |
| Your EBITDA | ₹9,00,00,000 (15%) |
| Peer A | EV/Revenue 2.4× · EV/EBITDA 14.0× |
| Peer B | EV/Revenue 1.8× · EV/EBITDA 11.5× |
| Peer C | EV/Revenue 2.1× · EV/EBITDA 12.5× |
| Step | Formula | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Blended peer EV/Revenue | (2.4 + 1.8 + 2.1) ÷ 3 | 2.1× |
| Blended peer EV/EBITDA | (14.0 + 11.5 + 12.5) ÷ 3 | 12.67× |
| Apply 35% private-company discount | 2.1 × 0.65 and 12.67 × 0.65 | 1.37× revenue and 8.23× EBITDA |
| Revenue-based value | 60,00,00,000 × 1.37 | ₹82,20,00,000 |
| EBITDA-based value | 9,00,00,000 × 8.23 | ₹74,07,00,000 |
| Blend (50/50) | (82,20,00,000 + 74,07,00,000) ÷ 2 | ₹78,13,50,000 |
The two multiples land within 10% of each other, which is a good sign that the peer set is genuinely comparable. A wide gap usually means the margin profile differs from the peers.
Valuenomic runs this method alongside five others and weights the results.